Quote from: rebirther on March 12, 2009, 08:01:10 AMI can accept the way they choose to run their organization.However, I still wish to understand. And it is difficult for me to understand, because I’ve been practising both for several years now, with only benefits for my mental health. So, in my opinion, they should look beyond the label “reikiâ€.For me, it is very strange that an organization promoting a technique to see things as they are, does not see things as they are.Also, they would allow me to do one retreat. What does that mean? The danger comes later???It’s a pity that they’re following some rule blindly and that there was no opportunity to discuss this with someone who actually knew why or who would have been prepared/able to look beyond the label “reikiâ€.Anyway, I’m just expressing my thoughts here. I’m not really expecting an answer. Not on the essence anyway.I do however would like some thought on my question from yesterday on running during a retreat. Anyone? I am just hypothesizing here but I guess they assume that you would follow the rules and not practice reiki while in the retreat. Once you go back home, you start mixing both and then the problems might arise. If you then develop a routine of reiki and vipassana you might keep it in the following retreats.I do not know the true reason beyond what I wrote: some reiki practionners experienced mental problems when mixing the practice with vipassana. Goenka's retrat are un-compromising and the isolation of the practionner is strong. Some people develop serotonin related problems due to the lack of external stimuli. But this is what I read on the web so I can't tell if it is true or not. I wouldn't exclude a form of "religious exclusivity" common to many meditation traditions. Goenka in his evening speech warns to stay with one meditation technique, not to mix with others, but his explanation as to why this shouldn't be done is just an allegory, nothing real. He says "Imagine your self riding a horse and suddenly you decide to ride a second horse. How can you ride two horses at the same time? One leg on one horse and the other one the other horse?" It doesn't satisfy me.
I can accept the way they choose to run their organization.However, I still wish to understand. And it is difficult for me to understand, because I’ve been practising both for several years now, with only benefits for my mental health. So, in my opinion, they should look beyond the label “reikiâ€.For me, it is very strange that an organization promoting a technique to see things as they are, does not see things as they are.Also, they would allow me to do one retreat. What does that mean? The danger comes later???It’s a pity that they’re following some rule blindly and that there was no opportunity to discuss this with someone who actually knew why or who would have been prepared/able to look beyond the label “reikiâ€.Anyway, I’m just expressing my thoughts here. I’m not really expecting an answer. Not on the essence anyway.I do however would like some thought on my question from yesterday on running during a retreat. Anyone?
Goenka doesn't endorse Reiki because Reiki practice is to change patterns or paths of negative energy in the body. Vipassana is to observe things as they are, not to change what is being felt. They are two completely different techniques. I believe Reiki has a place, especially for those who will likely never become Vipassana players. It helps to move a negative energy focus in the body. Vipassana practice is to accept what is and eventually let it unravel on it's own through observation. Doing both is akin to doing power-lifting to train for a marathon. Both power-lifting and marathons are great for fitness but mixing the techniques doesn't make sense. Being able to run 26 miles is not going to help to squat 500+ pounds or vice-versa.