Hello Stefan,
I take a little offense to this yin yang teaching. I find it builds on the late (last 10.000-6000 years) teaching of evil and good (that there is evil as a real something and good as an equally real something), light/dark and so forth. But there is no dark, only light. There is no dark, only the relative absence of a certain amount of light. there is no cold, only the lack of a certain amount of heat. So also there is no evil, only good (and there is always atleast a little bit of good everywhere). The analogy of female/male feminine/masculine was used because it served well because of what it culturally stood for. Namely the female standing for feeling and male for rational. but it is outdated. (And also i believe, yin/yang & Archetypical symbolism is not a bhudda/dhamma teaching?)
I find what you say is contradictory or paradoxial and also that you are getting a few things confused. By superior/inferior is different from inequal you are stating something like hot are both cold are inequal to different. sup/inferior hot/cold are both functions of a concept and inequality/difference signifies. By sup/inferior i mean complete/defective healthy/sick. I am go way more into this if you request, but i want to say other things first.
I find your Adolf Hitler analogy offensive, thats like saying Jesus is a criminal because of the christian crusades or that the (current) Dalai Lama is a criminal because a few tibetians are being bad. I (get the idea) in the same way you insinuate that this superior/inferior idea i am expressing is evil because a disturbed somebody had used that idea to do horrific things. That problem was not the idea itself but what was done with it. The same thing that is being done with rat poison, being 99% food and 1% poison oor lets examplify the bible, 99% true but 1% lethal assumption or lets say bhuddism, 99% true but 1% messes it up for most.
I mean to examplify that there is no point in discussing these kind of things, because they don't have any good application/utility and just a way to divide, conquer, traumatize etc... (as your holocaust analogy examplifies) There is no point in discussing it for many reasons. 1 Because it has been rigged / boobytrapped to be divisive/confusing/darkening/evil in our society and 2 it just isnt usefull for anything. None Can do any practical good with it. It goes back to an idea i see expressed in the new testament: Your only going to get to 'heaven' as simple as a young child. (Matthew 18:3) Young children don't get into elaborate arguments. Their life radiates all the teaching anyone ever need to know.